Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
International Journal of Toxicology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Farber, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Farber, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Hepatocarcinogenesis: How Do Peroxisome Proliferators Relate?

Emmanuel Farber

Department of Pathology University of Toronto Medical Sciences Building Toronto, Ontario, Canada M55 1A8

There is an increasing awareness that many peroxisome proliferators are being introduced into our environment and many of these have shown carcinogenic activity in some rodent species. The agents involved include drugs (e.g., hypolipdemic agents of several chemical structures including HMG CoA reductase inhibitors) and industrial chemicals. The neoplasms seen are mainly in the liver with a variable incidence in the pancreas. The association between peroxisome proliferation and neoplasms is impressive. Yet, there are several seemingly fundamental differences between carcinogenic peroxisome proliferators and mutagenic or genotoxic chemical carcinogens. Peroxisome proliferators in general are neither mutagenic nor genotoxic and do not induce precancerous hepatic lesions and liver cell cancer until they have reached the late stage. With many agents, it appears that a considerable degree of peroxisome proliferation must take place for them to be carcinogenic. One poorly documented speculation is that peroxisome proliferators induce cancer by acting mainly as promoters, presupposing that the animals being tested are "preinitiated," a conclusion that is scientifically indefensible. This presentation covers a comparison between the key requirements for cancer development with genotoxic agents and those seen with peroxisome proliferators, and discusses the methylation of genes for selective enzymes of the resistance phenotype induced by mutagenic carcinogens.

International Journal of Toxicology, Vol. 11, No. 3, 363-367 (1992)
DOI: 10.3109/10915819209141876


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?