Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
International Journal of Toxicology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Freudenthal, R. I.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Freudenthal, R. I.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, D. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Determining the Potential of Aromatic Amines to Induce Cancer of the Urinary Bladder

Ralph I. Freudenthal

Consultant, West Palm Beach, Florida, USA

Ellen Stephens

ChemFirst Inc., Pascagoula, Mississippi, USA

Daniel P. Anderson

ChemFirst Inc., Pascagoula, Mississippi, USA

Aromatic amines have been associated with the induction of cancer of the urinary bladder. Commercial production started over 100 years ago in Europe, with the synthesis of a mauve pigment from aniline. The discovery of other pigments by combining aniline with various chemicals initiated the aniline dye industry. By the turn of the century, a correlation between working in the dyestuff industry and the development of bladder cancer was established. Initially thought to be the result of exposure to aniline, various investigators identified benzidine, beta-naphthylamine, and 4-aminobipheny 1 as the causative agents. Evaluations of various aromatic amines in rats, mice, guinea pigs, rabbits, dogs, and monkeys showed significant species differences, with the dog and monkey being the most sensitive species. Several laboratories related these species differences to differences in the respective routes by which the various species metabolized aromatic amines. Excellent correspondence was shown between metabolic activation of benzidine, 4-aminobiphenyl, and beta-naphthylamine in dogs and primates and the induction of bladder cancer. Rodents were shown to be unresponsive to human bladder carcinogens. The need to use data developed in the most sensitive species, the dog, is essential to accurately predict the carcinogenic potential of aromatic amines.

Key Words: Urinary Bladder • Bladder Cancer • Aromatic Amines • Animal Model • O-Toluidine • Benzidine • 4-Aminobiphenyl • Species Differences

International Journal of Toxicology, Vol. 18, No. 5, 353-359 (1999)
DOI: 10.1080/109158199225260


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?