Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
International Journal of Toxicology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, S.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, B.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lee, S.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, B.-H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Biological Monitoring of Exposure to Cisplatin in Rats Using SOS Chromotest

Sang-Jun Lee

College of Pharmacy and Medicinal Resources Research Center, Wonkwang University, Iksan, Chonbuk, Korea

Jang-Hyun Hur

Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Kangwon National University, Chunchon, Kangwon-do, Korea

Byung-Hoon Lee

College of Pharmacy and Medicinal Resources Research Center, Wonkwang University, Iksan, Chonbuk, Korea

Cisplatin (CDDP) is a potent antitumor drug used in the treatment of a variety of solid tumors. The purpose of the present study was to establish screening biomarker of exposure to CDDP using SOS chromotest. The ultimate goal of this screen is to facilitate the choice of an effective drug and the prognosis of the therapy. In the current screening protocol, the SOS chromotests were performed on the urine of Sprague-Dawley rats administered intravenously with CDDP. Urine samples were collected individually in the metabolic cage at 6 (U0–6) and 12 hours (U6–12) after treatment and were tested their DNA damaging effects. The urine samples obtained from the rats administered with 1 mg/kg CDDP did not induce SOS response in our experimental conditions. At a dose of 5 mg/kg, two out of five rat showed more than 50% increase in the DNA damaging effect compared to that of the control. The genotoxic effect was observed only in the U0–6, whereas the U6–12 were not genotoxic but cytotoxic to the test strain. Similar results were obtained at a dose of 10 mg/kg: 5 out of 10 rats showed SOS response and the U6–12 were also proven to be cytotoxic. These results suggest that the method presented in this study could be used as a biomarker of exposure to CDDP.

Key Words: Biomonitoring • Cisplatin • DNA Damage • Rat • SOS Chromotest

International Journal of Toxicology, Vol. 19, No. 1, 13-17 (2000)
DOI: 10.1080/109158100224999
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?