Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
International Journal of Toxicology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Duuren, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Banerjee, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Van Duuren, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Banerjee, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Thresholds in Chemical Carcinogenesis

Benjamin L. Van Duuren, Sc.D.

Laboratory of Organic Chemistry and Carcinogenesis Institute of Environmental Medicine New York University Medical Center

Sipra Banerjee, Ph.D.

Laboratory of Organic Chemistry and Carcinogenesis Institute of Environmental Medicine New York University Medical Center

This review deals with the controversial subject of thresholds in chemical carcinogenesis. It is essential to consider this subject in relation to a number of other matters which have a direct bearing on it. These include the use of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in animal bioassays. These are at times excessive and not consistent with the definition of the MTD. Many bioassays are carried out at only one or two doses so that reliable dose-response curves and hence a threshold cannot be established. In addition, laboratory animal bioassays even at the lowest doses used are frequently above those encountered in the environment by several orders of magnitude. The various biochemical and biologic events which a xenobiotic is subjected to in vivo are described in more detail in relation to threshold. Also, dose-dependent alterations in metabolic pathways are reviewed for vinyl chloride and 1, 4-dioxane. The value of examining the muta-genidty and cardnogenidty of activated carcinogenic intermediates is examined using a series of chloroalkene epoxides as intermediates. The interdisciplinary approaches that need to be used in risk assessment, which is required by federal regulatory agencies, are pointed out. It is concluded that thresholds do exist for some chemical carcinogens.

International Journal of Toxicology, Vol. 2, No. 3, 85-100 (1983)
DOI: 10.3109/10915818309140693


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?