This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Kamrin, M. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kamrin, M. A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The "Low Dose" Hypothesis: Validity and Implications for Human Risk

Center for Integrative Toxicology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA

Correspondence: Address correspondence to Michael A. Kamrin, PhD, 167 Granite Road, Williamston, MI 48895, USA. E-mail:kamrin{at}msu.edu

In the late 1990s, a "low dose" hypothesis was proposed based on studies that purported to show that hormonally active environmental agents were causing a variety of effects, mainly reproductive and developmental, at "low doses." The supporters of this hypothesis claim that traditional "high-dose" toxicity studies are not adequate to assess adverse effects from these hormonally active agents in that they do not detect effects that are occurring at "low doses." In addition, it is claimed that these "low dose" effects are occurring at levels comparable to those to which humans are being exposed. These claims have been controversial and expert panels evaluated the evidence behind them in the early 2000s. Although these panels generally concluded that such "low dose" effects were not conclusively established, proponents of the "low dose" hypothesis assert that a large number of more recent studies now provide clear support for their hypothesis. This review carefully examines both recent and older studies that have been cited to support the "low dose" hypothesis, including their relevance for the human population. These include in vivo and in vitro laboratory studies as well as a very limited number of epidemiological investigations. Based on the evidence, it is concluded that these "low dose" effects have yet to be established, that the studies purported to support these cannot be validly extrapolated to humans, and the doses at which the studies have been performed are significantly higher than the levels to which humans are exposed.

Key Words: Bisphenol A • Developmental Toxicity • Endocrine Disruptor • Environmental Contaminants • Low Dose • Reproductive Toxicity

International Journal of Toxicology, Vol. 26, No. 1, 13-23 (2007)
DOI: 10.1080/10915810601117968


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J.-S. Lim, D.-H. Lee, and D. R. Jacobs Jr. Association of Brominated Flame Retardants With Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome in the U.S. Population, 2003-2004 Diabetes Care, September 1, 2008; 31(9): 1802 - 1807. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]