| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Nonclinical Aspects of Biopharmaceutical Development: Discussion of Case Studies at a PhRMA-FDA WorkshopEli Lilly & Co., Greenfield, Indiana, USA
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
Glaxo Smith Kline, Ware, Hertfordshire, UK
Pfizer Inc., Groton, Connecticut, USA
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
Bristol Myers Squibb, East Syracuse, New York, USA
Glaxo Smith Kline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, USA
AstraZeneca, Wilmington, Delaware, USA
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
AstraZeneca, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA
Medimmune Inc., Hayward, California
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
Eli Lilly & Co., Greenfield, Indiana, USA
Medimmune Inc., Hayward, California Correspondence: Address correspondence to Lorrene A. Buckley, PhD, Eli Lilly and Company, DC 1940, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN 46285, USA. E-mail:BuckleyLA{at}lilly.com Robust assessments of the nonclinical safety profile of biopharmaceuticals are best developed on a scientifically justified, case-by-case basis, with consideration of the therapeutic molecule, molecular target, and differences/similarities between nonclinical species and humans (ICH S6). Significant experience has been gained in the 10 years ensuing since publication of the ICH S6 guidance. In a PhRMA-FDA–sponsored workshop, "Nonclinical Aspects of Biopharmaceutical Development," industry and US regulatory representatives engaged in exploration of current scientific and regulatory issues relating to the nonclinical development of biopharmaceuticals in order to share scientific learning and experience and to work towards establishing consistency in application of general principles and approaches. The proceedings and discussions of this workshop confirm general alignment of strategy and tactics in development of biopharmaceuticals with regard to such areas as species selection, selection of high doses in toxicology studies, selection of clinical doses, the conduct of developmental and reproductive toxicity (DART) studies, and assessment of carcinogenic potential. However, several important aspects, including, for example, appropriate use of homologues, nonhuman primates, and/or in vitro models in the assessment of risk for potential developmental and carcinogenic effects, were identified as requiring further scientific exploration and discussion.
Key Words: Biopharmaceuticals Nonclinical Regulatory Safety Assessment
International Journal of Toxicology, Vol. 27, No. 4,
303-312 (2008) |
||||