Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
International Journal of Toxicology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Homburger, F.
Right arrow Articles by Soto, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Homburger, F.
Right arrow Articles by Soto, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Hamsters and Gerbils: Advantages and Disadvantages as Models in Toxicity Testing

F. Homburger

President and Director Bio Research Institute, Inc. 380 Green Street Cambridge, MA 02139

C. G. Van Dongen

President and Director Bio Research Institute, Inc. 380 Green Street Cambridge, MA 02139

R. A. Adams

President and Director Bio Research Institute, Inc. 380 Green Street Cambridge, MA 02139

E. Soto

President and Director Bio Research Institute, Inc. 380 Green Street Cambridge, MA 02139

The need for additional species of laboratory animals for toxicity testing, especially for chronic (lifetime) carcinogenesis bioassay, becomes more apparent as data on such tests in mice and rats accumulate and undergo analysis. The results of approximately half of the lifetime carcinogenesis bioassays conducted by the National Cancer Institute and the National Toxicology Program were either equivocal or unevaluable. Some changes must, therefore, be considered for carcinogenesis bioassay guidelines, and foremost among such improvements would be the inclusion of a species with few spontaneous tumors, healthy parenchymal organs (especially liver), and proven susceptibility to administered standard carcinogens and other substances known to be carcinogenic to man or other laboratory animals. Mesocricetus auratus, the Syrian golden hamster, is such a species. A considerable body of background information on Syrian hamsters is available and continues to accumulate in the literature. Information on gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus) is less voluminous, but that which is known suggests that this species as well could contribute toward improvement in toxicological and carcinogenesis bioassays. There are some limitations, however, which apply to gerbils, namely, a much longer lifespan than most other laboratory rodents, fairly high frequency of spontaneous tumors, and great diversity in the nature of such naturally occurring tumors. Gerbil population genetics has been studied less thoroughly. Inbred Syrian hamsters and their genetically defined hybrids, standardized for carcinogenesis responsiveness, healthy and long-lived, are now readily available, making it possible to reproduce results at any time in different laboratories.

International Journal of Toxicology, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-15 (1985)
DOI: 10.3109/10915818509014500


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?